At first, it was just a partisan back and forth.
The GOP wanted to show that the Governor was spending more time on his second job as Chair of the Democratic National Committee that he had originally let on.
Taking on Kaine was a good way for Pat Mullins and Tim Murtaugh to show the GOP faithful that the RPV was no longer a sideshow.
If they could knock his approval ratings from the 50’s to the 40’s, McDonnell’s chances of winning go up dramatically.
So they sent the Governor a FOIA.
They wanted to know when and where he was traveling, how much his security was costing, and who was paying.
The Governor’s office cleverly lawyered the request.
It wasn’t tightly drawn. It asked for too much. If they consented to a FOIA on a fishing expedition, they’d set a horrible precedent.
Don’t Governors need to be able to protect the state’s interests by talking to people privately and meeting with them without a public advertisement?
They told the RPV to take a hike (or take us to court if you want).
But It Took a New Twist and Became a Man Bites Dog Story
The mainstream media got involved.
And the MSM adopted the GOP stance.
I’m not joking. They really did.
For higher and more principled reasons of course.
Transparency is the essence of democratic governance they said. They maintained that it’s the obligation of the Governor to keep faith with this principle. (And to prevent us from getting in trouble with our editors by sneaking out of town and making news in another state.)
Mark Sanford and that “sparking thing” in Argentina didn’t do the Governor any good. Our guy really does hike the Appalachian Trail and is a genuinely upstanding and committed family man.
But Sanford’s made it a lot tougher to defend a “private” travel schedule.
Now the Post’s made it a Cause.
Anita Kumar raised the issue from the get-go.
She’s not letting it go.
I spoke to a person on the Governor’s team who told me that it is really a non-issue.
Every time the Post puts a story on their blog about it, I was told, nobody comments. It gets no traction.
But it doesn’t matter how many comments are on the blogs.
Reporters who takes on Governors over transparency are going to be winners inside their own newspaper every time.
The Post editorialized against Kaine.
And for Kumar by name.
What’s a Governor to Do?
It’s could be very difficult (politically) to hold firm.
Amost every story now quotes an “open government expert” saying that the travel schedule should be disclosed.
But there’s something even more worrisome.
When the media turn againstyou on an issue, a contagion effect often takes hold and they start to hit you on other matters.
I suspect that at some time another calculation might be made.
How much will victory on travel disclosure cost elsewhere?






Non-issue, my foot (and other anatomical territories)!
The mere fact that you’re writing about it is proof-positive that this is a first-rank blunder that will seethe and grow unless the guv ignores whoever these nit-wits are advising him, follows his own good instinct and sense, and reverses! And TODAY is the day to do it. There is not a deader news cycle on the calendar this year than the one beginning today. This is stupid! Be done with it today! BKD
just disclose. how tough is that? his travel is for the DNC, we all know that; so we already know that he is not working for us in the Commonwealth. we just want to know exactly for whom the DNC has the Gov. working.
Yep, it’s piling on. The Virginian-Pilot agrees that he should make the records public.
It will be interesting to see how this changes the perception of Kaine in the media.
I think there could be cause for concern if our Governor is traveling at taxpayer expense to further the aims of the DNC.
Would this be a pardonable offense? Yes, but if he traveled for the DNC at the expense of Virginia taxpayers, the DNC should pony up and pay for the travel expenses.
I realize that not everything is cut and dried, and that there will be grey areas. But if Governor Kaine does not fear that disclosure might reveal obvious abuses he should just make public the records.
We do have a potential abuse of travel expenses combined with an obvious conflict in interests here after all. While we Virginians (including me) have been voting Democratic recently, that does not mean we want to see Democrats looting the Virginia treasure chest for the goals of the Democratic Party.