1. What Happened to Summer Vacation?
In Virginia politics this summer. Lawsuits against the Fed. UVA v. Cuccinelli. A signature ABC privatization proposal from the Governor. The AG making headlines almost every day. An immigration proposal to turn Virginia into Arizona East. Congressional races heating up that’ll be a national barometer. There’s no recession in the political arena. Who wouldn’t want to own a television station in the 2nd or 5th Congressional districts?
2. Rasmussen v. VCU
We also had dueling polls this week. Rasmussen came out with a survey that had Bob McDonnell’s approval rating at 64%, sixteen points higher than the numbers released by VCU last week. Part of the difference may be that Rasmussen’s survey centered on “likely voters” while VCU’s tapped “adult Virginians.” I noted last week that I was surprised by VCU’s numbers on McDonnell, largely because other aspects of the same poll showed a fairly dramatic turnaround for the state’s “right track” number since the final year of the Kaine administration. VCU’s survey operation (which once reported to me) does an excellent job, but on this one number I tend to think that Rasmussen is closer to where the voters probably are.
3. Corey Stewart
The Chairman of the Prince William County Board of Supervisors announced that he is forming the Virginia Rule of Law PAC to propose and support an Arizona-like immigration law in the Commonwealth. He’ll be traveling around the state, raising money, and using the dollars donated to support legislative candidates in the 2011 elections. Regardless of what you think of the proposal, it is one of the most creative ways that a local government official with statewide aspirations has ever developed to gain name recognition across the Commonwealth. Starting today, you can put Stewart’s name into the 2013 statewide calculus.
4. The Governor Comes to Town
This week, Bob McDonnell starts a series of town halls that have been scheduled for every region of the Comonwealth. Initial stories have focused on how he’ll utilize the town halls to support his proposals on ABC privatization (and I guess that opponents of the policy change might be organizing to attend the events as well). But I think the town halls are part of a larger strategy from the McDonnell team. It’s the Governor’s way of communicating directly with the public, of moving out of the Richmond political bubble, and not having media coverage dominated by the priorities of the media itself.
5. Speaking About ABC Privatization
I have a bit of personal bias in favor the general concept since I served as Executive Director of the Wilder Commission which recommended that the Commonwealth seriously consider moving forward with privatization. It also seems to me that the McDonnell team under the leadership of Eric Finkbeiner is crafting a serious, financially responsible proposal. I’ve yet to hear any potential opponent make a convincing case that the sale and distribution of alcohol should remain a core service of Virginia state government. But here’s the political challenge. ABC privatization simply does not have a “natural” statewide constituency that can be easily mobilized on behalf of the proposal. My sense is that the upcoming town halls are part of a wide ranging strategy that the McDonnell administration is developing to translate good policy into legislative success. It may well become the signature political battle of his first two years in office.
6. If You Think Virginia has Challenges
I’ve been on a mini-vacation in Florida for the past few days helping my dad celebrate his 95th birthday (more of us should be this fortunate). The political news down here is extraordinary. Local governments are struggling with far more dramatic fiscal reductions than we’ve seen in the Commonwealth. And some of the recent polling results are mind-boggling. For the past few months, everyone has been talking about a three way Senate race between current Governor Charlie Crist running as an independent, Republican conservative Marco Rubio and Democratic congressman Kendrick Meek. But it appears that Meek is likely to lose the Democratic nod (by a wide margin) to a billionaire Palm Beach businessman named Jeff Greene. I think Greene is likely to pose far more of a challenge to Crist than Meek will, providing a far better opportunity for Rubio. And in the GOP race for Governor, former Congressman and current Florida AG Bill McCollum is actually now slightly behind another businessman, Rick Scott. If the Sunshine State is any indication, we’re in for a wild political ride this fall.






My felicitations to your father.
As you may know, Virginia is the only state that bans the use and sale of detectors. There is no evidence that the detector ban increases highway safety. Our nation’s fatality rates have fallen consistently for almost two decades. Virginia’s fatality rate has also fallen, but not any more dramatically than it has nationwide. Research has even shown that radar detector owners have a lower accident rate than motorists who do not own a detector.
Maintaining the ban is not in the best interest of Virginians or visitors to the state. I know and know of people that will not drive in Virginia due to this ban. Unjust enforcement practices are not unheard of, and radar detectors can keep safe motorists from being exploited by abusive speed traps. Likewise, the ban has a negative impact on Virginia’s business community. Electronic distributors lose business to neighboring states and Virginia misses out on valuable sales tax revenue.
Radar detector bans do not work. Research and experience show that radar detector bans do not result in lower accident rates, improved speed-limit compliance or reduce auto insurance expenditures.
• The Virginia radar detector ban is difficult and expensive to enforce. The Virginia ban diverts precious law enforcement resources from more important duties.
• Radar detectors are legal in the rest of the nation, in all 49 other states. In fact, the first state to test a radar detector ban, Connecticut, repealed the law – it ruled the law was ineffective and unfair. It is time for our Virginia to join the rest of the nation.
• It has never been shown that radar detectors cause accidents or even encourage motorists to drive faster than they would otherwise. The Yankelovich – Clancy – Shulman Radar Detector Study conducted in 1987, showed that radar detector users drove an average of 34% further between accidents (233,933 miles versus 174,554 miles) than non radar detector users. The study also showed that they have much higher seat belt use compliance. If drivers with radar detectors have fewer accidents, it follows that they have reduced insurance costs – it is counterproductive to ban radar detectors.
• In a similar study performed in Great Britain by MORI in 2001 the summary reports that “Users (of radar detectors) appear to travel 50% further between accidents than non-users. In this survey the users interviewed traveling on average 217,353 miles between accidents compared to 143,401 miles between accidents of those non-users randomly drawn from the general public.” The MORI study also reported “Three quarters agree, perhaps unsurprisingly, that since purchasing a radar detector they have become more conscious about keeping to the speed limit…” and “Three in five detector users claim to have become a safer driver since purchasing a detector.”
• Modern radar detectors play a significant role in preventing accidents and laying the technology foundation for the Safety Warning System® (SWS). Radar detectors with SWS alert motorists to oncoming emergency vehicles, potential road hazards, and unusual traffic conditions. There are more than 10 million radar detectors with SWS in use nationwide. The federal government has earmarked $2.1 million for further study of the SWS over a three-year period of time. The U.S. Department of Transportation is administering grants to state and local governments to purchase the SWS system and study its effectiveness (for example, in the form of SWS transmitters for school buses and emergency vehicles). The drivers of Virginia deserve the right to the important safety benefits that SWS delivers.
*** A small surcharge($5-$10) or tax(2%-3%) could be added to the price of the device to make-up for any possible loss of revenue from reduced number of speeding tickets and the loss of tickets written for radar detectors.***
Please sign this petition and help repeal this ban and give drivers in Virginia the freedom to know if they are under surveillance and to use their property legally:
http://www.stoptheban.org
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/repeal-the-virginia-radar-detector-ban